025. The Economic Impact of Cultural Institutions
025. The Economic Impact of Cultural Institutions
For a more comprehensive exploration of this topic, a detailed PDF version of the article is available for download from this link.
1. Introduction
The role of arts and culture institutions extends far beyond their immediate aesthetic, medium-to-long term educational functions, and community social involvement, branching into economic contributions that affect local and national economies. Recent research has highlighted several key ways in which arts and culture institutions contribute to economic development. These include attracting private and public investment, but also generating significant private and public spending, particularly through cultural tourism and cultural consumption; stimulating economic growth by attracting knowledge industries, stimulating housing markets, and contributing to job creation and increased income through both direct employment and the multiplier effects associated with event-related spending, just to name a few. This comprehensive understanding reveals the economic value that arts and culture bring to communities, transcending (without denying) traditional views of their societal role.
This expanded understanding of the economic impacts of arts and culture institutions is crucial for their managers, as it redefines their roles far beyond mere custodians of artistic excellence. They emerge not only as managers of performances and exhibitions but also as agents of economic development. Their strategic decisions and leadership extend the influence of these institutions beyond the physical confines of performance halls and galleries, directly contributing to the wealth of the broader community. This dual role as cultural and economic leaders places an added layer of responsibility on their shoulders, emphasising the significance of their contributions to both the cultural and economic ecosystems.
2. Key Insights
An initial exploration of the field, along with a review of existing scientific literature, highlights three critical areas of interest: indicators and methodologies to assess such impact, the benefits of investing in arts and culture, and the roles of cultural tourism and public spending. The scope is to provide a draft framework to better understand how these institutions contribute not only to the aesthetic, educational and social landscape but also play an essential role in economic stimulation and development. Each insight sheds light on the significant and diverse economic contributions made by performing arts entities, underlining their importance to both local and national economies.
2.1. Economic Indicators and Methodologies
Research into the financial and economic impact of arts and culture institutions reveals that both public and private spending play crucial roles. Private spending often stems from cultural tourism and consumption, while public investments typically focus on cultural programs and infrastructure development. To quantify these impacts, economists use structural equation models that consider variables such as cultural supply and demand, funding levels, and socio-economic factors like urban scale and education. These models help delineate the ways in which culture contributes to economic vitality, even capturing differences across different cultural genres and scales.
2.2. Benefits of Investing in Arts and Culture
Investments in arts and culture yield a variety of economic dividends, enhancing local economies through job creation, reputational awareness, and increased household income. Such investments attract businesses and skilled workers, particularly in the knowledge sector, thereby stimulating local economies and enhancing property values. Arts and culture also foster innovation and creativity, essential for broader social and economic growth. These sectors act as catalysts for community development too, engaging local populations and promoting social cohesion. Long-term commitment to cultural investment is essential, as it supports sustainable economic growth and maximises social benefits. Recent studies demonstrate that investments in arts and culture institutions manifest their benefits in multiple ways.
2.3. Cultural Tourism and Public Spending
Cultural tourism significantly enhances the economic impact of arts institutions by attracting higher spending from non-local attendees compared to local patrons. This influx of tourists supports local jobs and generates substantial income for communities. Public spending on arts not only bolsters this effect but also promotes further economic activity by attracting additional investment and supporting local businesses. The role of public funding is pivotal, as it justifies the economic sustainability of cultural projects through its multiplier effects, which enhance local tax bases and stimulate regional economic development. Cultural events and institutions serve as important instruments for urban revitalisation and improving city images too, making them attractive destinations for both visitors and potential residents.
3. Opportunities for Future Research
While existing literature provides a substantial understanding of the economic impact of arts and culture institutions, there remains considerable scope for deepening our comprehension in several key areas. These future research directions can help us to more accurately measure and enhance the economic contributions of performing arts, ensuring that both policymakers and cultural managers have the necessary insights to foster both cultural vibrancy and economic vitality. Here are five pivotal areas identified for future research:
Methodological Development in Impact Assessments
Economic Longevity of Cultural Initiatives
Cultural Consumption and Its Economic Implications
Integration of Cultural Economics into Broader Economic Systems
Refined Economic Impact Assessments of Cultural Tourism
The existing research into the economic impact of arts and culture institutions offers a robust foundation but also highlights significant opportunities for further exploration. These future research directions are pivotal in refining our understanding of how these institutions catalyse economic and social development.
Continuing this line of inquiry will yield valuable insights that are instrumental in shaping effective cultural policies, enhancing economic benefits, and improving overall community welfare. Moreover, such studies will clarify the roles that arts and cultural institutions play in urban regeneration, socio-economic development; they may also help policy makers and guide strategic decision-making.
4. Why Does It Matters to Managers of Arts and Culture Institutions?
Understanding the economic impact of arts and culture institutions is not only a scholarly interest but also a critical managerial tool. The evolving role of managers in performing arts institutions demands a deeper appreciation of how their decisions influence broader economic outcomes. Managers are no longer just custodians of cultural heritage and artistic excellence but are pivotal in steering their institutions towards enhanced economic engagement and community integration.
Arts and culture managers play a role in shaping the economic landscapes of their communities by driving significant public and private investment and spending into culture, tourism (and hospitality), and infrastructure. The ability to measure and articulate the economic impact of their institutions helps managers secure funding, advocate for policy support, and justify public spending. Additionally, by understanding the economic contributions of their institutions —such as job creation, urban regeneration, and event-goers attraction— managers can strategically plan events and programs that maximise economic benefits while fulfilling their cultural mission.
These insights are crucial not just for securing resources but for aligning the institution’s activities with broader economic development goals and local/national political agendas. This alignment is particularly significant in times of economic downturn, where arts and culture institutions can play a stabilising role.
The Strategic Role of Managers in Economic Impact
Managers of arts and culture institutions are pivotal in leveraging the economic potential of their organisations. Their role extends beyond the artistic and cultural missions to include substantial contributions to economic development. Effectively managing cultural assets can enhance local economies through reputation development and local brand awareness, community engagement, and infrastructure development, to name a few.
Economic Advocacy and Funding
Strategic Planning and Economic Integration
Community and Economic Resilience
Innovation and Economic Growth
5. Conclusion
The economic influence of performing arts extends far beyond the direct financial outputs of cultural events and institutional expenditures. It covers a wide range of social and economic benefits, from enhancing the vibrancy of communities to contributing to the gross domestic product. The ripple effects of cultural activities include boosting local economies through tourism, creating jobs, and fostering an environment that encourages innovation and creativity.
As this article highlights, while the current literature provides a strong foundation for understanding the economic impacts of arts and culture, there remains ample space for further research. For managers of these institutions, the insights from such studies are invaluable. They provide a robust framework for demonstrating the worth of their institutions beyond the cultural sphere, into significant economic domains. Continued exploration in this field will not only help in crafting informed strategies that leverage the economic strengths of arts and culture but will also ensure that these institutions continue to thrive and contribute to the socio-economic fabric of their communities effectively.
Managers of arts and culture institutions secure their place within both the cultural and broader economic ecosystems through the strategic integration of cultural vibrancy and economic vitality. The ongoing research and deeper understanding of their economic impact are essential for facing the challenges and opportunities that lie ahead in the cultural and economic landscapes.
DOI: https://osf.io/preprints/osf/n7rgb
References
Bowitz, Einar, and Karin Ibenholt. 2009. ‘Economic Impacts of Cultural Heritage – Research and Perspectives’. Journal of Cultural Heritage 10: 1–8. doi:10.1016/J.CULHER.2008.09.002.
Cohen, Randy, W. Schaffer, and Benjamin D. Davidson. 2003. ‘Arts and Economic Prosperity: The Economic Impact of Nonprofit Arts Organizations and Their Audiences’. The Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society 33 (January): 17–31. doi:10.1080/10632920309597338.
Colonna, Carl M. 2011. ‘The Impact Of Public Funding On Cultural Urban Revitalization’. Journal of Business & Economics Research (JBER) 1 (3). doi:10.19030/jber.v1i3.2984.
Delconte, J., C. Kline, and C. Scavo. 2016. ‘The Impacts of Local Arts Agencies on Community Placemaking and Heritage Tourism’. Journal of Heritage Tourism 11 (October): 324–335. doi:10.1080/1743873X.2015.1088019.
DiNoto, Michael J., and Lawrence H. Merk. 1993. ‘Small Economy Estimates of the Impact of the Arts’. Journal of Cultural Economics 17 (December): 41–53. doi:10.1007/BF02310581.
Dragan Klaic. 2009. ‘The Economy of Arts Festivals: An Elusive, Untransparent Dimension’. Economia Della Cultura, no. 3: 317–324. doi:10.1446/31104.
Dungey, Jo. 2004. ‘Overview: Arts, Culture and the Local Economy’. Local Economy: The Journal of the Local Economy Policy Unit 19 (4): 411–413. doi:10.1080/0269094042000286882.
Farrell, B. 2016. ‘Understanding the Value of Arts & Culture: The AHRC Cultural Value Project (2016) by Geoffrey Crossick and Patrycja Kaszynska’. Cultural Trends 25 (October): 273–276. doi:10.1080/09548963.2016.1241382.
Felsenstein, Daniel, and Aliza Fleischer. 2003. ‘Local Festivals and Tourism Promotion: The Role of Public Assistance and Visitor Expenditure’. Journal of Travel Research 41 (4): 385–392. doi:10.1177/0047287503041004007.
Glückler, Johannes, and Robert Panitz. 2023. “Live Music in the Time of Corona: On the Resilience and Impact of a Philharmonic Orchestra on the Urban Economy.” Sustainability: Science Practice and Policy 15 (4): 3611. doi:10.3390/su15043611.
Grodach, C. 2011. ‘Art Spaces in Community and Economic Development: Connections to Neighborhoods, Artists, and the Cultural Economy’. Journal of Planning Education and Research 31 (March): 74–85. doi:10.1177/0739456X10391668.
Harper, G., and Randy Cohen. 2008. ‘A Summary of The Americans for the Arts Economic Impact of America’s Non-Profit Arts and Culture Industry’. Creative Industries Journal 1 (January): 73–75. doi:10.1386/CIJ.1.1.73_7.
Hart, K. 1984. ‘Changing Public Attitudes Toward Funding of the Arts’. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 471 (January): 45–56. doi:10.1177/0002716284471001005.
Henry, L. 1981. ‘The Economic Benefits of the Arts: A Neuropsychological Comment’. Journal of Cultural Economics 5 (June): 52–60. doi:10.1007/BF00189206.
Herrero, L., J. A. Sanz, M. Devesa, Ana María Bedate, and del Barrio. 2006. ‘The Economic Impact of Cultural Events’. European Urban and Regional Studies 13 (January): 41–57. doi:10.1177/0969776406058946.
Jancovich, Leila. 2016. ‘Building Local Capacity in the Arts’. Journal of Policy Research in Tourism, Leisure and Events 8 (July): 289–306. doi:10.1080/19407963.2016.1209676.
Markusen, A., and Anne Gadwa. 2010. ‘Arts and Culture in Urban or Regional Planning: A Review and Research Agenda’. Journal of Planning Education and Research 29 (January): 379–391. doi:10.1177/0739456X09354380.
Markusen, Ann, and Greg Schrock. 2006. ‘The Artistic Dividend: Urban Artistic Specialisation and Economic Development Implications’. Urban Studies 43 (10): 1661–1686. doi:10.1080/00420980600888478.
Moon, HeeWon, and WoongJo Chang. 2023. ‘An Exploratory Study on Performance Indicators of Arts and Cultural Social Enterprises’. Korean Arts Association of Arts Management, November. doi:10.52564/jamp.2023.68.5.
Morganti, Ilaria Maria, and Massimiliano Nuccio. 2010. ‘The Economic Value of Cultural Projects: An Evaluation Beyond Measurements’. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.1692026.
Pinnock, Andrew. 2009. ‘The Measure of All Things: On the Use of Time as a Value Indicator in Arts Impact Assessment’. Cultural Trends 18 (February): 47–74. doi:10.1080/09548960802651229.
Rivera, Manuel Antonio, T. Hara, and G. Kock. 2008. ‘Economic Impact of Cultural Events: The Case of the Zora! Festival’. Journal of Heritage Tourism 3 (August): 121–137. doi:10.1080/17438730802138139.
Salvaggio, Salvino A. 2023. Orchestra Management in Practice. 1st ed. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781032629636.
Scott-Lennox, J., J. Blau, and H. Reid. 1993. ‘Cultural Supply, Demand, and Funding: A Framework for the Measurement of Cultural Indicators☆’. Poetics 21 (August): 481–498. doi:10.1016/0304-422X(93)90010-E.
Tighe, A. J. 1985. ‘Cultural Tourism in the USA’. Tourism Management 6 (December): 234–251. doi:10.1016/0261-5177(85)90001-9.
Walters, Trudie, L. Chandler, and S. Clark. 2018. ‘Towards a Framework for Measuring Local Government Return on Investment in Arts and Cultural Development’. Local Government Studies 45 (September): 262–280. doi:10.1080/03003930.2018.1518220.
Wiener, L. 1980. ‘Cultural Resources: An Old Asset — a New Market for Tourism’. Journal of Cultural Economics 4 (June): 1–7. doi:10.1007/BF00240640.
Zan, Luca, Anthony Blackstock, G. Cerutti, and Carlo Mayer. 2000. ‘Accounting for Art’. Scandinavian Journal of Management 16 (September): 335–347. doi:10.1016/S0956-5221(00)00006-3.
More details and relevant bibliographic references may be found in my new book, Orchestra Management in Practice (Routledge, London, 2024).
The author, not a native English speaker, used Large Language Models (LLMs) for editing the article, addressing grammar, syntax, and spelling, enhancing fluency and readability. Academically, LLMs helped in peer-reviewing, identifying gaps, and suggesting improvements.
#culturalmanagement #businessstrategy #orchestramanagement #economicimpact