020. Funding Models and Management Mindset
The relationship between an orchestra's funding model and the management mindset of its leadership team is a crucial yet understudied aspect of cultural institution operations. The type of predominant funding source – government, private sector, or a mix – tends to influence the organisation's management approach, pushing it towards an administrative, entrepreneurial, or hybrid mindset respectively.
Substantial government backing often leads to a more administrative approach to management, where financial stability allows managers to concentrate on orchestral operations, artistic excellence, and routine processes. Conversely, the unpredictability of private funding in a competitive environment typically necessitates an entrepreneurial mindset, with managers actively seeking to secure financial resources and to introduce notative frameworks to gain visibility and funding. However, this funding-versus-mindset dynamic is not static; an orchestra's management approach can also impact its ability to attract certain types of funding. An entrepreneurial mindset, for instance, may prove more adept at soliciting private sector funds than an administrative one.
Preliminary research suggests that risk propensity in specific domains could also be influenced by the funding model and management mindset, though the exact nature of this relationship requires further exploration.
The distinct features characterising administrative and entrepreneurial management mindsets manifest in distinct operational, strategic, and relational practices, profoundly shaping an orchestra's operations and engagement with various stakeholders. The key differentiating (though archetypical) features could be summarised as follows:
Administrative Management Mindset
Operational Efficiency: Prioritises smooth operations
Stability and Consistency: Values predictable routines and established procedures
Internal Networking: Concentrates on strengthening relationships within the organisation
Financial Stewardship: Ensures wise use of available funds and budget control
Long-term Planning: Engages in long-term strategic planning
Harmony Within Artistic Team: Fosters a collaborative environment and aligns the artistic team with the orchestral vision
Local Community Engagement: Focuses on maintaining good relationships with the local community through traditional outreach
Board Relationship: Aims to maintain a serene relationship, focusing on governance and fiduciary duties
Entrepreneurial Management Mindset
Innovation and Risk-taking: Seeks new opportunities and is willing to take calculated risks
Agility and Adaptability: Navigates uncertain environments and leverages changes for strategic advantage
External Networking: Emphasises robust relationships with donors, sponsors, partners, and the broader community
Fundraising and Resource Acquisition: Prioritises fundraising activities and acquiring resources from diverse sources
Short- to Medium-Term Planning: Focuses more on medium-term planning, remaining responsive to shifting landscapes
Leadership in Artistic Direction: Involves him/herself in artistic discussions, challenging the team to explore new repertoires, collaborations, or formats
Broad Community Engagement: Pursues innovative ways of community engagement, reaching new audiences, volunteers, and supporters
Board Relationship: Seeks a more collaborative and productive relationship with the board, leveraging their resources and network for strategic initiatives and fundraising
As countries traverse the spectrum of funding models, each orchestra moulds its own management style rooted in its distinct background and context. Government-funded orchestras typically exhibit an administrative mindset, while those relying primarily on private funding adopt an entrepreneurial approach. Hybrid models necessitate a blend of administrative and entrepreneurial mindsets. However, no single model is inherently superior; each comes with its own strengths and challenges. Government funding offers stability but may foster complacency, while private funding empowers but is unpredictable. Hybrid models provide balance but require deftly shifting between mindsets.
The influence of diverse arts funding models on management philosophies within cultural institutions represents a relatively new yet burgeoning area of research inquiry. Though much remains to be explored, some preliminary studies have identified developing trends in how funding sources and their inherent financial dynamics mold the strategic planning, decision-making processes, and broader management approaches throughout the arts and cultural realm.
Government funding models, which require adherence to policy initiatives, lead to performance management systems that reflect governmental strategic priorities, influencing management to focus on socio-cultural objectives alongside financial sustainability.
The principles and practices of New Public Management (NPM) have shifted the style of public administration in the cultural sector towards an "instrumental turn," where arts are funded as a means to an end, such as social inclusion or economic development, rather than for their intrinsic value.
Different models of interaction between culture, arts, and the state in terms of financing, such as those in Europe, the USA, and Russia, highlight the need for arts managers to understand and adapt to the specifics of cultural and arts management compared to general production management.
Reforms in funding mechanisms, like those in Italy, emphasise a project-related approach and call for transparency, yet they may not fully address the need for a more comprehensive governance model that includes public-private partnerships and network-based collaborations.
Innovative funding models, such as social impact funds and artists' royalties, suggest a shift towards artist-centric sustainable investing, which could influence management styles to focus on value creation and equitable distribution of profits within the creative fields.
Arts funding models have a significant impact on management styles within arts organisations. Government funding and policy initiatives tend to shape performance management systems towards socio-cultural and financial objectives. The adoption of NPM principles has led to an instrumental approach to arts funding, focusing on the arts' utility for broader social and economic goals. The need for arts managers to adapt to specific funding models is evident across different regions. Reforms in funding mechanisms are pushing for greater transparency and project-related approaches, while innovative models like social impact funds are promoting artist-centric investment strategies. These funding influences necessitate a flexible and responsive management style that can navigate the complex interplay between financial sustainability and the intrinsic value of the arts.
Ultimately, the dynamics between funding sources and management mindsets form the backbone of the operational model within orchestras, shaping how these cultural institutions navigate their environment and secure their future. While this examination is not exhaustive, it paves the way for further studies to delve into these connections, extending the inquiry to other cultural institutions, geographical contexts, and longer periods, contributing to the growing body of knowledge around the management of arts and culture institutions.
References
Abdullah, Aminah, Iqbal Khadaroo, and Christopher J. Napier. 2018. "Managing the Performance of Arts Organisations: Pursuing Heterogeneous Objectives in an Era of Austerity." The British Accounting Review 50 (2): 174–184. doi:10.1016/j.bar.2017.10.001.
Belfiore, Eleonora. 2004. "Auditing Culture." International Journal of Cultural Policy 10: 183–202. doi:10.1080/10286630042000255808.
Byrnes, William. 2022. Management and the Arts. Focal Press - Elsevier.
Caust, Jo. 2003. "Putting the 'Art' Back into Arts Policy Making: How Arts Policy Has Been 'Captured' by the Economists and the Marketers." International Journal of Cultural Policy 9 (1): 51–63. doi:10.1080/1028663032000089723.
de Wit, Arjen, and Rene Bekkers. 2016. "Government Support and Charitable Donations: A Meta-Analysis of the Crowding-out Hypothesis." SocArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/9ysjm.
Donato, Fabio. 2014. "What's a Performing Arts Funding Mechanism For?" doi:10.1446/79945.
Grannemann, H., and A. Whitaker. 2019. "Artists' Royalties and Performers' Equity: A Ground-Up Approach to Social Impact Investment in Creative Fields" 3: 33–51. doi:10.30819/cmse.3-2.02.
Loots, Ellen. 2015. "The Income Standard for the Performing and Visual Arts in the Netherlands: A Simple Indicator of Financial Performance or a Transition to Another Mode of Supporting Non-Profit Organizations?" Zeitschrift Für Kulturmanagement 1 (1): 53–74. doi:10.14361/zkmm-2015-0105.
McClelland, Patrick L., Xin Liang, and Vincent L. Barker. 2010. "CEO Commitment to the Status Quo: Replication and Extension Using Content Analysis." Journal of Management 36 (5): 1251–1277.
Musteen, Martina, Vincent L. Barker III, and Virginia L. Baeten. 2006. "CEO Attributes Associated with Attitude toward Change: The Direct and Moderating Effects of CEO Tenure." Journal of Business Research 59 (5): 604–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2005.10.008.
Yakupov, Alexandr N. 2021. "Specifics of Modern Culture and Arts Management and the Models of Its Functioning in Europe, the USA, and Russia." Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Arts, Design and Contemporary Education (ICADCE 2021). doi:10.2991/assehr.k.210813.001.
Zhong, Daheng. 2023. "The Government Subsidies Effect on the Company Strategic Change-Theory and Emprical." BCP Business & Management 38 (March): 3090–3103. https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpbm.v38i.4240.
More details and relevant bibliographic references may be found in my new book, Orchestra Management in Practice (Routledge, London, 2024).
The author, not a native English speaker, used Large Language Models (LLMs) for editing the article, addressing grammar, syntax, and spelling, enhancing fluency and readability, and translating sections from his native languages.
#culturalmanagement #businessstrategy #orchestramanagement #managementmodels #fundingmodels